It’s Confusing Because It’s Simpler


Creating a Works Cited list using the eighth edition

MLA has turned to a style of documentation that is based on a general method that may be applied to every possible source, to many different types of writing. But since texts have become increasingly mobile, and the same document may be found in several different sources, following a set of fixed rules is no longer sufficient.

The current system is based on a few principles, rather than an extensive list of specific rules. While the handbook still gives examples of how to cite sources, it is organized according to the process of documentation, rather than by the sources themselves. This process teaches writers a flexible method that is universally applicable. Once you are familiar with the method, you can use it to document any type of source, for any type of paper, in any field.

Here is an overview of the process:

When deciding how to cite your source, start by consulting the list of core elements. These are the general pieces of information that MLA suggests including in each Works Cited entry. In your citation, the elements should be listed in the following order:

  1. Author.
  2. Title of source.
  3. Title of container,
  4. Other contributors,
  5. Version,
  6. Number,
  7. Publisher,
  8. Publication date,
  9. Location.

Each element should be followed by the punctuation mark shown here. Earlier editions of the handbook included the place of publication, and required punctuation such as journal editions in parentheses, and colons after issue numbers. In the current version, punctuation is simpler (just commas and periods separate the elements), and information about the source is kept to the basics.


Begin the entry with the author’s last name, followed by a comma and the rest of the name, as presented in the work. End this element with a period.

Said, Edward W. Culture and Imperialism. Knopf, 1994.

Title of source

The title of the source should follow the author’s name. Depending upon the type of source, it should be listed in italics or quotation marks.

A book should be in italics:

Henley, Patricia. The Hummingbird House. MacMurray, 1999.

A website should be in italics:

Lundman, Susan. “How to Make Vegetarian Chili.” eHow,*

A periodical (journal, magazine, newspaper article) should be in quotation marks:

Bagchi, Alaknanda. “Conflicting Nationalisms: The Voice of the Subaltern in Mahasweta Devi’s Bashai Tudu.” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, vol. 15, no. 1, 1996, pp. 41-50.

A song or piece of music on an album should be in quotation marks:

Beyoncé. “Pray You Catch Me.” Lemonade, Parkwood Entertainment, 2016,

*The eighth edition handbook recommends including URLs when citing online sources. For more information, see the “Optional Elements” section below.

Title of container

Unlike earlier versions, the eighth edition refers to containers, which are the larger wholes in which the source is located. For example, if you want to cite a poem that is listed in a collection of poems, the individual poem is the source, while the larger collection is the container. The title of the container is usually italicized and followed by a comma, since the information that follows next describes the container.

Kincaid, Jamaica. “Girl.” The Vintage Book of Contemporary American Short Stories, edited by Tobias Wolff, Vintage, 1994, pp. 306-07.

The container may also be a television series, which is made up of episodes.

“94 Meetings.” Parks and Recreation, created by Greg Daniels and Michael Schur, performance by Amy Poehler, season 2, episode 21, Deedle-Dee Productions and Universal Media Studios, 2010.

The container may also be a website, which contains articles, postings, and other works.

Zinkievich, Craig. Interview by Gareth Von Kallenbach. Skewed & Reviewed, 27 Apr. 2009, Accessed 15 Mar. 2009.

In some cases, a container might be within a larger container. You might have read a book of short stories on Google Books, or watched a television series on Netflix. You might have found the electronic version of a journal on JSTOR. It is important to cite these containers within containers so that your readers can find the exact source that you used.

“94 Meetings.” Parks and Recreation, season 2, episode 21, NBC, 29 Apr. 2010. Netflix,

Langhamer, Claire. “Love and Courtship in Mid-Twentieth-Century England.” Historical Journal, vol. 50, no. 1, 2007, pp. 173-96. ProQuest, doi:10.1017/S0018246X06005966. Accessed 27 May 2009.

Other contributors

In addition to the author, there may be other contributors to the source who should be credited, such as editors, illustrators, translators, etc. If their contributions are relevant to your research, or necessary to identify the source, include their names in your documentation.

Note: In the eighth edition, terms like editor, illustrator, translator, etc., are no longer abbreviated.

Foucault, Michel. Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. Translated by Richard Howard, Vintage-Random House, 1988.

Woolf, Virginia. Jacob’s Room. Annotated and with an introduction by Vara Neverow, Harcourt, Inc., 2008.


If a source is listed as an edition or version of a work, include it in your citation.

The Bible. Authorized King James Version, Oxford UP, 1998.

Crowley, Sharon, and Debra Hawhee. Ancient Rhetorics for Contemporary Students. 3rd ed., Pearson, 2004.


If a source is part of a numbered sequence, such as a multi-volume book, or journal with both volume and issue numbers, those numbers must be listed in your citation.

Dolby, Nadine. “Research in Youth Culture and Policy: Current Conditions and Future Directions.” Social Work and Society: The International Online-Only Journal, vol. 6, no.2, 2008, Accessed 20 May 2009

“94 Meetings.” Parks and Recreation, created by Greg Daniels and Michael Schur, performance by Amy Poehler, season 2, episode 21, Deedle-Dee Productions and Universal Media Studios, 2010.

Quintilian. Institutio Oratoria. Translated by H. E. Butler, vol. 2, Loeb-Harvard UP, 1980.


The publisher produces or distributes the source to the public. If there is more than one publisher, and they are all are relevant to your research, list them in your citation, separated by a forward slash (/).

Klee, Paul. Twittering Machine. 1922. Museum of Modern Art, New York. The Artchive, Accessed May 2006.

Women’s Health: Problems of the Digestive System. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2006.

Daniels, Greg and Michael Schur, creators. Parks and Recreation. Deedle-Dee Productions and Universal Media Studios, 2015.

Note: the publisher’s name need not be included in the following sources: periodicals, works published by their author or editor, a Web cite whose title is the same name as its publisher, a Web cite that makes works available but does not actually publish them (such as YouTube, WordPress, or JSTOR).

Publication date

The same source may have been published on more than one date, such as an online version of an original source. For example, a television series might have aired on a broadcast network on one date, but released on Netflix on a different date. When the source has more than one date, it is sufficient to use the date that is most relevant to your use of it. If you’re unsure about which date to use, go with the date of the source’s original publication.

In the following example, Mutant Enemy is the primary production company, and “Hush” was released in 1999. This is the way to create a general citation for a television episode.

“Hush.” Buffy the Vampire Slayer, created by Joss Whedon, performance by Sarah Michelle Gellar, season 4, Mutant Enemy, 1999.

However, if you are discussing, for example, the historical context in which the episode originally aired, you should cite the full date. Because you are specifying the date of airing, you would then use WB Television Network (rather than Mutant Enemy), because it was the network (rather than the production company) that aired the episode on the date you’re citing.

“Hush.” Buffy the Vampire Slayer, created by Joss Whedon, performance by Sarah Michelle Gellar, season 4, episode 10, WB Television Network, 14 Dec. 1999.


You should be as specific as possible in identifying a work’s location.

An essay in a book, or an article in journal should include page numbers.

Adiche, Chimamanda Ngozi. “On Monday of Last Week.” The Thing around Your Neck, Alfred A. Knopf, 2009, pp. 74-94.

The location of an online work should include a URL.

Wheelis, Mark. “Investigating Disease Outbreaks Under a Protocol to the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention.” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 6, no. 6, 2000, pp. 595-600, Accessed 8 Feb. 2009.

A physical object that you experienced firsthand should identify the place of location.

Matisse, Henri. The Swimming Pool. 1952, Museum of Modern Art, New York.

Optional elements

The eighth edition is designed to be as streamlined as possible. The author should include any information that helps readers easily identify the source, without including unnecessary information that may be distracting. The following is a list of select optional elements that should be part of a documented source at the writer’s discretion.

Date of original publication:

If a source has been published on more than one date, the writer may want to include both dates if it will provide the reader with necessary or helpful information.

Erdrich, Louise. Love Medicine. 1984. Perennial-Harper, 1993.

City of publication:

The seventh edition handbook required the city in which a publisher is located, but the eighth edition states that this is only necessary in particular instances, such as in a work published before 1900. Since pre-1900 works were usually associated with the city in which they were published, your documentation may substitute the city name for the publisher’s name.

Thoreau, Henry David. Excursions. Boston, 1863.

Date of access:

When you cite an online source, the MLA Handbook recommends including a date of access on which you accessed the material, since an online work may change or move at any time.

Bernstein, Mark. “10 Tips on Writing the Living Web.” A List Apart: For People Who Make Websites, 16 Aug. 2002, Accessed 4 May 2009.


As mentioned above, while the eighth edition recommends including URLs when you cite online sources, you should always check with your instructor or editor and include URLs at their discretion.


A DOI, or digital object identifier, is a series of digits and letters that leads to the location of an online source. Articles in journals are often assigned DOIs to ensure that the source is locatable, even if the URL changes. If your source is listed with a DOI, use that instead of a URL.

Alonso, Alvaro, and Julio A. Camargo. “Toxicity of Nitrite to Three Species of Freshwater Invertebrates.” Environmental Toxicology, vol. 21, no. 1, 3 Feb. 2006, pp. 90-94. Wiley Online Library, doi: 10.1002/tox.20155.

Creating in-text citations using the eighth edition

The in-text citation is a brief reference within your text that indicates the source you consulted. It should properly attribute any ideas, paraphrases, or direct quotations to your source, and should direct readers to the entry in the list of works cited. For the most part, an in-text citation is the author’s name and page number (or just the page number, if the author is named in the sentence) in parentheses:

Imperialism is “the practice, the theory, and the attitudes of a dominating metropolitan center ruling a distant territory” (Said 9).


According to Edward W. Said, imperialism is defined by “the practice, the theory, and the attitudes of a dominating metropolitan center ruling a distant territory” (9).
Work Cited
Said, Edward W. Culture and Imperialism. Knopf, 1994.

When creating in-text citations for media that has a runtime, such as a movie or podcast, include the range of hours, minutes and seconds you plan to reference, like so (00:02:15-00:02:35).

Again, your goal is to attribute your source and provide your reader with a reference without interrupting your text. Your readers should be able to follow the flow of your argument without becoming distracted by extra information.

Final thoughts about the eighth edition

The current MLA guidelines teach you a widely applicable skill. Once you become familiar with the core elements that should be included in each entry in the Works Cited list, you will be able to create documentation for any type of source. While the handbook still includes helpful examples that you may use as guidelines, you will not need to consult it every time you need to figure out how to cite a source you’ve never used before. If you include the core elements, in the proper order, using consistent punctuation, you will be fully equipped to create a list of works cited on your own.

How to Cite the Purdue OWL in MLA

Entire Website

The Purdue OWL. Purdue U Writing Lab, 2016.

Individual Resources

Contributors’ names and the last edited date can be found in the orange boxes at the top of every page on the OWL.

Contributors’ names. “Title of Resource.” The Purdue OWL, Purdue U Writing Lab, Last edited date.

Russell, Tony, et al. “MLA Formatting and Style Guide.” The Purdue OWL. Purdue U Writing Lab, 2 Aug. 2016.


Research Final Questions and Answers

question-mark3aDo I have to use a certain number of sources? No, not necessarily.  When creating new knowledge, the challenge will always be to present your knowledge in such a way that you are supporting what you say.  More important than the number of sources would be the quality of those sources and a variety of sources.  Of course, a student’s topic will always dictate the type of source required.  Watch assignments carefully.  Instructors will be very specific when it comes to their pet peeves.

Should the title pertain to the actual topic of our research or to how-to part of the paper? The title should always reflect what the research essay, as a whole, is about.   In our case, your research essay is about writing a research paper about a particular topic.  This is what your title will reflect.

How would you cite a source that is included in the booklet that comes with a CD? According to the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, 6th ed., The following format order is used for citing  CD or Album notes:

Ex.  Author.  “Title of writing.”  Singer.  Album Title.  Label, Year.

What if there is more than one sentence from a single source in our writing?  Do we just cite them after the last sentence or after every one? Each in text citation (parenthetical documentation) references the sentence in which it is contained.   A block quote is the exception.

When you ask for parenthetical documentation do you mean in-text citations? Yes, these terms are used interchangeably.

Where do I find information about HOCs and LOCs? There are two places you can find this information.  1.  Your class notes.  2.

Do you need to include a citation for well known information if it was information that you looked up just to make sure that it was correct? No, if you mean by well known as common knowledge – something we all know.

Is there a specific length to the essay? I have know way of knowing how many words or pages you need to complete your essay in the best way possible.  Focus on quality.

What should be cited in a research paper? Cite everything that is not your own words and your own ideas.   Citing correctly in the final essay will certainly show your audience that you know this concept.

What kinds of qualifications should we look for in person we interview? I would assume you would want them to be knowledgeable in the topic you are researching.  The more they know the better.

Can we interview anyone in the class, other English teachers, etc? Sure!

When we talk about pre-writing activities that we have learned in class, do we need to credit someone for that or is that considered common knowledge? No.  But, if you need a refresher and use the reference guide, you will need to cite that information.

Wiki what?


The Internet has made your job, as a college student, so much easier. I remember, and this was not quite as long ago as my students believe, when I was an undergraduate working on my first academic research essays. I attended Lindenwood College, now University. Our library was an old converted church. It was a beautiful building and an interesting home for books and journals. There were still wooden card catalogs and work tables with lovely lamps, but no computers. Nothing was computerized. I knew little of research. The Internet was new and for most home computer owners AOL was the only means of sending and receiving e-mail and navigating the Internet, which by comparison, seems lacking in great regard to what my students have available to them today.

Now, research is a breeze. Finding just the right search terms seem to be the focus of most research whining these days and don’t even get me started on Intellectual Property – that is for another blog post at another time. Once you grasp the language of your topic research becomes easier. We used to narrow our searches with Booleans. Now, the database provides opportunities to narrow our search with a click of a button. Also, searchers can pick and choose exactly the kind of source it is they are looking for. Amazing. We have come a long way, baby, but a few constants still are found among English faculty and across the curriculum. There is so much information out there, available just by clicking, that concerns of reliability and validity our shouted from academy offices and classrooms.


Dictionaries are a good source for looking up a word I don’t know, but definitions are a lousy way to begin a research paper. The hook of the definition is gone, replaced by socially constructed ways of seeing the language in the world, or in a field. Remember, the writer has control over the definitions, over the language. A good college student looks up words he doesn’t know for better understanding. A bad college student believes the words in the definition without challenging them or testing them in field of study they are searching.

Encyclopedias are a good place to begin. But, not the end all of research as it was for students of the fifties, sixties, and seventies. Who writes these things anyway? How long is the information valid? Reliable? What happens when knowledge changes but the dust lingers on the set of matching bindings with gold foil? The color on the bindings began to fade with advent of Wikipedia. Wikis are another good place to start, but a terrible place to stay while researching. Just for fun, go to a Wiki, and add your own research, your own voice, your own slant. What happens? How long will you exist and remain? Who are you reading? Do you know? Here is the irony. Wikis are socially constructed and what did I write about definitions? I may be a hypocrite, but, remember: “I’m the teacher. That’s why.”

Check these out:

An Introduction


Writing a term, or research, paper is not always my idea of a good time.  I often feel lost in a strange world of professor pet peeves, measures and rules.  In other words, the fear of writing knocks at my door and I, in my infinite denial, invite him in to reside.  I sit before the computer screen, curser blinking, white screen blinding.  I think of many things:  Where do I begin?  Why do I have to write this stupid paper?  What’s in it for me?  Do teachers stay up late at night thinking of ways to torture me?  This is where my process begins.  The deadline creates the anxiety and the anxiety drives the writing.  My research writing process is not always pretty, not always what is considered the right way, or most efficient, but it does work for me and often brings me to a place of learning something new and something about myself as a writer.

Where is my thesis statement?  – “My research writing process is not always pretty, not always what is considered the right way, or most efficient, but it does work for me and often brings me to a place of learning something new and something about myself as a writer.”

Now I have to back this up.

~Ms. A

Ms. A’s Research Notes – Where To Begin

Well, the final exam has been handed out in English 101.  The exam itself is a two week process of in and out of class thinking, writing, and working.  I am asking you to write a Process Analysis.  What is this?  A Process Analysis is a how to guide.  Think of it as a for dummies guide for how you, yourself, writes a research paper.   Remember, your way may not look anything like my way, or another student’s way, or any way ever known.  It is a process that is unique to you and you alone.

In these research notes, I hope to help you keep on track with your final exam.  I will chime in about things that I think are helpful and important, and those things you have questions about.  You can comment here or send me an e-mail with questions or concerns. 

Today, I would like to share with the first steps I would take in this process.  The first thing I would do is go back and re-read the research chapter of the reference guide.  You were aked to do this several weeks ago, but since I did not test you on this, you may have neglected to motivate yourselves.  Now is a good time to know what is written in this chapter.  This is a great resource.  Remember, that even though this Process Analysis is about you, it must include your research.

~Ms. A